{"id":15315,"date":"2025-03-09T06:42:39","date_gmt":"2025-03-09T06:42:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2425\/business\/?post_type=acc_report&#038;p=15315"},"modified":"2026-06-25T01:04:39","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T01:04:39","slug":"%e0%b8%aa%e0%b9%88%e0%b8%a7%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%97%e0%b8%b5%e0%b9%88-4-%e0%b8%9c%e0%b8%a5%e0%b8%81%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%a3%e0%b8%94%e0%b8%b3%e0%b9%80%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%b4%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%87%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%99-4","status":"publish","type":"acc_report","link":"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/?acc_report=%e0%b8%aa%e0%b9%88%e0%b8%a7%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%97%e0%b8%b5%e0%b9%88-4-%e0%b8%9c%e0%b8%a5%e0%b8%81%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%a3%e0%b8%94%e0%b8%b3%e0%b9%80%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%b4%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%87%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%99-4","title":{"rendered":"Section 4 Performance Results Based on Quality Criteria (Criterion 4 &#8211; Student Assessment)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-blush-light-purple-gradient-background has-background wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:22px\"><strong><strong><strong>Criterion 4 &#8211; Student Assessment<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-pale-ocean-gradient-background has-background wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:20px\"><strong>Criterion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:20px\"><strong>Requirements<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-default is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"624\" height=\"352\" data-id=\"14846\" src=\"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/1-11.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-14846\" srcset=\"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/1-11.png 624w, https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/1-11-300x169.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 624px) 100vw, 624px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:20px\"><strong>Quality level assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"458\" height=\"81\" src=\"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/2-3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-14822\" srcset=\"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/2-3.png 458w, https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/02\/2-3-300x53.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 458px) 100vw, 458px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-blush-light-purple-gradient-background has-background wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:20px\"><strong>Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4.1 A variety of assessment methods are shown to be used and are shown to be constructively aligned to achieving the expected learning outcomes and the teaching and learning objectives.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bachelor of Accountancy (B.Acc.) Programme at St. Teresa International University (TRSU) adopts an Outcome-Based Education (OBE) approach in which student assessment is systematically designed and constructively aligned with the Expected Learning Outcomes (ELOs), Programme Learning Outcomes (PLOs), Year Learning Outcomes (YLOs), Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs), and teaching and learning objectives. The programme recognizes that students develop different competencies through different learning experiences and, therefore, employs a variety of assessment methods to comprehensively evaluate knowledge, skills, professional competencies, attitudes, and graduate attributes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-vertical is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-4fc3f8e1 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\"><div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle wp-block-ub-content-toggle-block\" id=\"ub-content-toggle-block-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\" data-mobilecollapse=\"false\" data-desktopcollapse=\"false\" data-preventcollapse=\"false\" data-showonlyone=\"false\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion\" style=\"border-color: #f1f1f1; \" id=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-block-\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-title-wrap\" style=\"background-color: #f1f1f1;\" aria-controls=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-0-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\" tabindex=\"0\">\n\t\t\t<p class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-title ub-content-toggle-title-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\" style=\"\"><strong>Variety of Assessment Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-toggle-wrap right\" style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-state-indicator wp-block-ub-chevron-down open\"><\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<div role=\"region\" aria-expanded=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-content-wrap\" id=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-0-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\">\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The programme integrates both formative and summative assessments across all levels of study:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Written Examinations<\/strong>: Test comprehension of theoretical concepts and application of accounting standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Assignments and Reports<\/strong>: Evaluate analytical skills, research ability, and written communication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Case Study Analyses<\/strong>: Assess problem-solving, ethical reasoning, and integration of theory with practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Group Projects and Presentations<\/strong>: Measure teamwork, collaboration, and oral communication skills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Simulations and Role-Play Exercises<\/strong>: Test professional judgment, decision-making, and adaptability in real-world scenarios.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Portfolios and Reflective Journals<\/strong>: Capture lifelong learning attitudes, self-assessment, and personal growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Internship and Cooperative Education Evaluations<\/strong>: Assess workplace readiness, professional competencies, and industry engagement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Capstone Project and Defense<\/strong>: Evaluate synthesis of multidisciplinary knowledge, leadership, and mastery of professional competencies.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion\" style=\"border-color: #f1f1f1; \" id=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-block-\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-title-wrap\" style=\"background-color: #f1f1f1;\" aria-controls=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-1-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\" tabindex=\"0\">\n\t\t\t<p class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-title ub-content-toggle-title-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\" style=\"\"><strong>Constructive Alignment with Learning Outcomes<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-toggle-wrap right\" style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-state-indicator wp-block-ub-chevron-down open\"><\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<div role=\"region\" aria-expanded=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-content-wrap\" id=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-1-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\">\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Assessment methods are intentionally mapped to specific outcomes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-nowrap is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Foundation Level (Year 1)<\/strong>: Quizzes, assignments, and presentations aligned with ELOs on basic knowledge of accountancy, finance, statistics, communication, and IT literacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Intermediate Level (Year 2)<\/strong>: Case studies, group projects, and applied assignments aligned with ELOs on analytical skills, teamwork, and application of accounting principles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Advanced Level (Year 3)<\/strong>: Research projects, simulations, and auditing exercises aligned with ELOs on professional judgment, ethical decision-making, and integration of knowledge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Mastery Level (Year 4)<\/strong>: Capstone projects, internship evaluations, and oral defenses aligned with PLOs on professional mastery, leadership, and lifelong learning.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion\" style=\"border-color: #f1f1f1; \" id=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-block-\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-title-wrap\" style=\"background-color: #f1f1f1;\" aria-controls=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-2-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\" tabindex=\"0\">\n\t\t\t<p class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-title ub-content-toggle-title-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\" style=\"\"><strong>Monitoring and Quality Assurance<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t<div class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-toggle-wrap right\" style=\"color: #000000;\"><span class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-state-indicator wp-block-ub-chevron-down open\"><\/span><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<div role=\"region\" aria-expanded=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-ub-content-toggle-accordion-content-wrap\" id=\"ub-content-toggle-panel-2-135ef503-0f2d-45d0-96f0-16bf3c2fd0b3\">\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group is-nowrap is-layout-flex wp-container-core-group-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-group-is-layout-flex\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To ensure fairness, reliability, and alignment:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Curriculum mapping<\/strong> links assessments directly to PLOs, YLOs, and ELOs.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Rubrics and marking schemes<\/strong> provide transparency and consistency in grading.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Peer review and moderation<\/strong> safeguard assessment quality across courses.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Student feedback<\/strong> informs continuous improvement of assessment design.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Employer and alumni surveys<\/strong> validate the relevance of assessment outcomes to professional practice.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Assessment Methods \u2013 Constructive Alignment Matrix<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Assessment Method<\/strong><\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\"><strong>Learning Outcomes (ELOs\/PLOs)<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Teaching &amp; Learning Objectives<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Written Examinations<\/strong><\/td><td>Mastery of accounting principles, standards, and theoretical knowledge<\/td><td>Ensure comprehension of core concepts and ability to apply them<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Assignments &amp; Reports<\/strong><\/td><td>Analytical skills, research ability, written communication<\/td><td>Develop independent learning, academic writing, and problem-solving<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Case Study Analyses<\/strong><\/td><td>Ethical reasoning, problem-solving, integration of theory and practice<\/td><td>Apply knowledge to real-world scenarios and evaluate alternatives<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Group Projects &amp; Presentations<\/strong><\/td><td>Teamwork, collaboration, oral communication<\/td><td>Foster cooperative learning and communication skills<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Simulations &amp; Role-Play<\/strong><\/td><td>Professional judgment, adaptability, decision-making<\/td><td>Provide experiential learning in authentic contexts<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Portfolios &amp; Reflective Journals<\/strong><\/td><td>Lifelong learning attitudes, self-assessment, personal growth<\/td><td>Encourage reflection, self-directed learning, and continuous improvement<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Internship &amp; Cooperative Education Evaluations<\/strong><\/td><td>Workplace readiness, professional competencies, industry engagement<\/td><td>Integrate classroom learning with professional practice<\/td><\/tr><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-left\" data-align=\"left\"><strong>Capstone Project &amp; Defense<\/strong><\/td><td>Synthesis of multidisciplinary knowledge, leadership, mastery of competencies<\/td><td>Demonstrate integration of knowledge and readiness for certification<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bachelor of Accountancy Programme at TRSU demonstrates the use of diverse, constructively aligned assessment methods that systematically support student achievement of learning outcomes. This alignment ensures that assessments are not only tools for measurement but also integral components of the teaching and learning process, fully consistent with AUN-QA Version 4.0 standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ID_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Name_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.1<\/td><td>&nbsp;&nbsp;System and Mechanism on Student Assessment<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.2<\/td><td>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1pQT1xzn48dT4weUPGfDNzCtRGaxmmW_x\/view?usp=share_link\">TQF 3 with assessment<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.3<\/td><td>Students\u2019 Satisfaction<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.4<\/td><td>Graduate Percentage<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.5<\/td><td>Faculty Meeting<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.6<\/td><td>Sample Rubrics for Assessment<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.7<\/td><td>Study Plan<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.8<\/td><td>Google Classroom Submissions<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.9<\/td><td>Business Innovation and Investment<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.10<\/td><td>Alignment of PLO to CLO<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1.11<\/td><td>Rubrics for Various Activities<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4.2 The assessment and assessment-appeal policies are shown to be explicit, communicated to students, and applied consistently.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bachelor of Accountancy (B.Acc.) Programme at TRSU has established clear and explicit policies governing assessment and assessment appeals. These policies are systematically communicated to students and faculty, ensuring transparency, fairness, and consistency in their application.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The&nbsp;<strong>assessment and assessment-appeal policies<\/strong>&nbsp;at St. Theresa International University are clearly regulated, well-documented, and consistently applied across all academic programs. These policies are detailed in the&nbsp;<strong>Undergraduate Student Handbook (2015)<\/strong>&nbsp;and further elaborated in course syllabi and during orientation sessions at the beginning of each semester. Students are informed of assessment procedures, grading criteria, and the appeal process through written documentation and verbal communication by course instructors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the beginning of each semester, instructors explain the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Assessment methods and grading criteria;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Weighting of assessments;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Attendance requirements;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Submission deadlines;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Examination regulations;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Academic integrity policies;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Procedures for grade review and appeals.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each course specifies the&nbsp;<strong>assessment methods, weightage, grading rubrics, and submission timelines<\/strong>. These are shared with students via the Google Classroom platform and the course syllabus. For instance, in the intermediate accounting course, assessments are divided into assignments, class tests, and a final exam, clearly stating their percentage contributions &#8211; <\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>20% Quiz and assignments<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>20% midterm Exam<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>60% final Exam<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This transparency ensures students understand how their performance is evaluated and what is expected in each task.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To maintain&nbsp;<strong>consistency and fairness<\/strong>, all instructors follow standardized rubrics and grading scales. Assessment criteria include not only academic accuracy but also demonstration of professional ethics and critical thinking. Policies on&nbsp;<strong>late submissions, re-evaluation, and academic integrity<\/strong>&nbsp;are uniformly enforced across all departments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Students are generally satisfied with the clarity and fairness of the assessment system, as evident from internal quality assurance reviews. However, in cases where students feel they have been evaluated unfairly, an&nbsp;<strong>appeal mechanism<\/strong>&nbsp;is available. The appeal procedure is outlined in the student handbook: students may submit a formal request for grade review, which is then reviewed by an internal academic committee. While formal appeals are rare, when they do occur, they mostly relate to perceived inconsistencies in marking or delays in feedback.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Assessment Appeal Process:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Students who believe that an assessment result is inaccurate or unfair have <strong>the right to appeal<\/strong> through a formal process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Submission of a request letter for grade review to the course instructor and to the registration office.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Review of the assessment and supporting evidence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Consultation with the program chair if necessary.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Submission of a formal appeal to the Faculty Academic Committee.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Final review and decision according to university regulations.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The appeal process ensures transparency, fairness, confidentiality, and equal treatment of all students.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The handbook also emphasizes academic integrity, outlining&nbsp;<strong>plagiarism policies and penalties<\/strong>. Proper citation, referencing methods, and expectations for original work are clearly communicated to all students.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ID_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Name_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.2.1<\/td><td>TQF Training and Orientation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.2.2<\/td><td>&nbsp;Class Material with Assessment<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.2.3<\/td><td>&nbsp;Google Classroom<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.2.4<\/td><td>Teaching Plan<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.2.5<\/td><td><a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1bGp3zjv_1sopoJbv0sd6OIZLavnocWWF\/view?usp=share_link\">Student Handbook<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.2.6<\/td><td>Examination Guidelines<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4.3 The assessment standards and procedures for student progression and degree completion, are shown to be explicit, communicated to students, and applied consistently.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bachelor of Accountancy (B.Acc.) Programme at St. Teresa International University (TRSU) has established clear, transparent, and comprehensive standards and procedures governing student progression, academic standing, and degree completion. These standards are designed in accordance with the University&#8217;s Academic Regulations, the requirements of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI), and the Thailand Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF). The programme ensures that all regulations relating to progression and graduation are explicitly defined, effectively communicated to students, and consistently implemented throughout the programme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The assessment standards and progression procedures are clearly articulated in the <strong>Undergraduate Student Handbook (2015)<\/strong>, University Academic Regulations, Programme Handbook, course syllabi, and programme specifications. These regulations are further reinforced through orientation programmes, academic advising sessions, faculty announcements, and the Learning Management System (LMS). At the beginning of their studies, students receive detailed information regarding academic requirements, assessment regulations, progression criteria, and graduation requirements, enabling them to plan their studies effectively and monitor their academic progress throughout the programme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For student progression, the programme adopts a continuous assessment approach in which students are evaluated through various assessment methods, including class tests, quizzes, assignments, projects, presentations, midterm examinations, and final examinations. Students are required to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance and achieve the intended Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) and Programme Learning Outcomes (PLOs) at each stage of their studies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The programme requires students to maintain a minimum <strong>Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) of 2.00 on a 4.00 scale<\/strong> in accordance with university regulations in order to progress through the programme and remain in good academic standing. Students whose academic performance falls below the prescribed standard may be placed on academic probation and are provided with academic counseling and support to improve their performance. The programme also applies prerequisite and co-requisite requirements for certain courses to ensure that students acquire the necessary foundational knowledge and competencies before progressing to more advanced and specialized subjects. This progression policy supports the logical sequencing of learning and ensures that students are adequately prepared to undertake higher-level accounting courses and professional learning experiences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The programme&#8217;s degree completion requirements are equally explicit and transparent. To qualify for graduation, students must successfully complete all programme requirements, including the prescribed number of credit hours in general education, business foundation courses, core accounting courses, and elective courses. Students must also successfully complete program-specific requirements such as <strong>internships<\/strong>, practical training, and other experiential learning activities as stipulated in the curriculum. Furthermore, students are required to maintain a minimum <strong>CGPA of 2.00<\/strong> at the time of graduation and satisfy all academic and administrative obligations before being recommended for the award of the degree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Student Progression and Degree Completion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<pre class=\"wp-block-preformatted\"> \u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n \u2502   Year 1: Foundation      \u2502\n \u2502   Complete basic courses  \u2502\n \u2502   Meet GPA requirement    \u2502\n \u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u252c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n             \u25bc\n \u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n \u2502   Year 2: Intermediate    \u2502\n \u2502   Pass prerequisites      \u2502\n \u2502   Progress to applied     \u2502\n \u2502   accounting courses      \u2502\n \u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u252c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n             \u25bc\n \u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n \u2502   Year 3: Advanced        \u2502\n \u2502   Complete core courses   \u2502\n \u2502   Internship placement    \u2502\n \u2502   Meet GPA requirement    \u2502\n \u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u252c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n             \u25bc\n \u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n \u2502   Year 4: Mastery         \u2502\n \u2502   Capstone project        \u2502\n \u2502   Internship evaluation   \u2502\n \u2502   Fulfill credit &amp; GPA    \u2502\n \u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u252c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n             \u25bc\n \u250c\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2510\n \u2502   Degree Completion       \u2502\n \u2502   Achievement of PLOs     \u2502\n \u2502   Graduation approval     \u2502\n \u2514\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2500\u2518\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The programme also maintains explicit policies regarding grading systems, course registration procedures, course withdrawals, academic probation, make-up examinations, and re-sit examinations. These policies are published in the Student Handbook and University Academic Regulations and are consistently applied across all courses and academic years. The University&#8217;s grading system, which utilizes letter grades and corresponding grade points, is uniformly implemented to ensure fairness, transparency, and consistency in the evaluation of student performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To support students in achieving academic success and completing the program in a timely manner, the Bachelor of Accountancy program provides a comprehensive academic advising system. Academic advisors meet regularly with students to discuss<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>academic performance, <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>course selection, <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>registration procedures, <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>progression requirements, and <\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>graduation planning.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Students experiencing academic difficulties receive additional guidance and support through mentoring, academic counseling, and individualized study plans. These support mechanisms help students understand their academic standing, identify areas for improvement, and make informed decisions regarding their studies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The implementation of progression and graduation standards is monitored by the Programme Committee, Faculty of Business Administration, and the Registrar&#8217;s Office to ensure consistent application of university regulations. Student academic records, grade reports, and degree audits are regularly reviewed to monitor students&#8217; progression and verify that all graduation requirements have been fulfilled. Faculty members and administrative staff are also regularly informed of any revisions to academic regulations to ensure consistent interpretation and implementation of policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The effectiveness of the progression and degree completion procedures is evaluated through programme reports (TQF7), course reports (TQF5), student feedback, academic performance analyses, graduation statistics, and quality assurance reviews. Information obtained from graduate tracer studies, employer surveys, and stakeholder consultations is also considered to ensure that graduation requirements remain relevant to the competencies expected by the accounting profession and industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Evidence from student satisfaction surveys and academic advising records indicates that students are generally well informed about progression requirements, graduation standards, and academic regulations and perceive these processes to be transparent and fairly implemented. The programme&#8217;s graduation and retention data further demonstrate that the established standards and support mechanisms effectively facilitate student progression and successful degree completion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bachelor of Accountancy Program, therefore, demonstrates that the assessment standards and procedures for student progression and degree completion are explicit, effectively communicated to students, and consistently implemented. The programme&#8217;s systematic approach promotes transparency, fairness, academic integrity, and student success while ensuring that graduates achieve the expected learning outcomes and professional competencies required by the accounting profession in accordance with the principles of Outcome-Based Education.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ID_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Name_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.3.1<\/td><td>&nbsp;Faculty Website<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.3.2<\/td><td>&nbsp;Study Plan<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.3.3<\/td><td>&nbsp;Advisory and Reports<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.3.4<\/td><td>Faculty Meeting<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.3.5<\/td><td><a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1bGp3zjv_1sopoJbv0sd6OIZLavnocWWF\/view?usp=share_link\">Student handbook<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4.4 The assessments methods are shown to include rubrics, marking schemes, timelines, and regulations, and these are shown to ensure validity, reliability, and fairness in assessment.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bachelor of Accountancy (B.Acc.) Programme at St. Teresa International University (TRSU) has established a comprehensive assessment system that incorporates clear rubrics, standardized marking schemes, well-defined timelines, and formal assessment regulations to ensure that student assessment is valid, reliable, transparent, and fair. The programme recognizes that a robust assessment framework is essential for accurately measuring student achievement of the Expected Learning Outcomes (ELOs), Programme Learning Outcomes (PLOs), and Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) while maintaining academic standards and promoting student confidence in the assessment process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Assessment methods in the Bachelor of Accountancy program are&nbsp;<strong>criterion-referenced<\/strong>, structured around clearly defined rubrics, detailed marking schemes, strict timelines, and institutional regulations. These elements are designed to ensure&nbsp;<strong>validity, reliability, and fairness<\/strong>&nbsp;in the evaluation of student performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As shown in the TQF3 and TQF5 course documentation for&nbsp;<em>Business Finance (211 311)<\/em>, all courses are required to apply&nbsp;<strong>rubrics and marking schemes<\/strong>&nbsp;aligned with specific Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) across domains including cognitive, ethical, interpersonal, and numerical skills. For instance, assessments such as assignments on&nbsp;<strong>capital budgeting, sensitivity analysis, and working capital management<\/strong>, are directly mapped to learning outcomes like quantitative analysis (LO 3.5.1), problem-solving (LO 3.3.1), and professional knowledge (LO 3.2.1), ensuring&nbsp;<strong>content and construct validity<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The programme ensures the validity, reliability, and fairness of assessments through a systematic and transparent approach. Assessment tasks, including examinations, assignments, case studies, and projects, are carefully designed and reviewed by course instructors and programme committees to ensure alignment with the intended Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) and Programme Learning Outcomes (PLOs) and to appropriately measure students&#8217; knowledge, skills, and competencies. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Assessment mapping is conducted to verify that sufficient evidence is collected to demonstrate learning outcome achievement. Each assessment activity includes clearly defined score allocations and standardized rubrics that communicate explicit performance criteria, promoting objective and consistent grading across all students. Furthermore, assessment weightings are predetermined and communicated to students, with <strong>20% allocated to continuous assessments, 20% to mid-term examinations, and 60% to final examinations<\/strong>, ensuring a balanced and equitable evaluation of student performance throughout the programme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To uphold&nbsp;<strong>reliability<\/strong>, student submissions are graded using consistent scoring guidelines, and peer or committee reviews are conducted to ensure grading accuracy. As described in Section 6.1 of the TQF5 document,&nbsp;<strong>peer verification and external reviewers<\/strong>&nbsp;assess how well the assessment tasks measure the targeted learning outcomes, adding a layer of&nbsp;<strong>quality control and external benchmarking<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The&nbsp;<strong>timelines for all submissions and exams are communicated in advance<\/strong>, and deadlines are strictly adhered to, promoting&nbsp;<strong>fair access to learning opportunities<\/strong>. Students are required to submit work through platforms such as&nbsp;<strong>Google Classroom<\/strong>, <strong>Line application, or via email<\/strong>, which supports standardized, timestamped submissions and timely instructor feedback.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In addition, academic regulations enforce rules regarding&nbsp;<strong>plagiarism, late submissions, and resubmission policies<\/strong>, ensuring procedural fairness and integrity. These are consistently applied across courses and well-communicated to students at the beginning of the semester through syllabi and orientation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In conclusion, the program maintains&nbsp;<strong>assessment integrity<\/strong>&nbsp;through rigorous design, constructive alignment with learning outcomes, and multi-layered evaluation processes. These mechanisms collectively ensure that students are assessed fairly, accurately, and in a manner that supports both academic development and professional readiness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ID_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Name_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4.1<\/td><td>&nbsp;Assessment Plan<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4.2<\/td><td>&nbsp;Teaching Plan<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4.3<\/td><td>&nbsp;Student Assessment and Examination Guidelines<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4.4<\/td><td>Students\u2019 Outputs<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4.5<\/td><td>TQF Review\/Comments<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4.6<\/td><td>Verification of Learning Outcomes Guidelines<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4.7<\/td><td>Assessment Guidelines and Policies<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4.8<\/td><td>Sample Exam Rubrics<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4.5 The assessment methods are shown to measure the achievement of the expected learning outcomes of the programme and its courses.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bachelor of Accountancy (B.Acc.) Programme at TRSU ensures that all assessment methods are constructively aligned to measure the achievement of the Expected Learning Outcomes (ELOs) at both course and programme levels. Assessments are designed not only to evaluate knowledge acquisition but also to measure skills, professional attributes, and ethical awareness. Each course specifies assessment strategies that directly map to its learning outcomes, while programme-level assessments such as internships and capstone projects confirm attainment of broader graduate attributes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This alignment is systematically monitored through curriculum mapping, outcome-based assessment rubrics, and continuous review processes. Evidence from student performance data, internship evaluations, employer feedback, and graduate tracer studies confirms that assessments effectively measure achievement of intended outcomes, ensuring graduates are competent, ethical, and industry-ready.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The use of multiple assessment methods enables the programme to evaluate various dimensions of student learning and ensures that evidence of learning is collected from different perspectives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Different assessment methods are intentionally used to measure different types of learning outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\"><strong>Learning Outcome<\/strong><\/td><td class=\"has-text-align-center\" data-align=\"center\"><strong>Assessment Methods<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Knowledge and understanding of accounting principles<\/td><td>Written examinations, quizzes, assignments<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Critical thinking and analytical skills<\/td><td>Case studies, problem-solving exercises, projects<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Communication and interpersonal skills<\/td><td>Presentations, group projects, seminars<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Digital and technological competencies<\/td><td>Accounting software assignments, practical exercises<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Professional ethics and responsibility<\/td><td>Case analyses, internship evaluations, reflective reports<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Leadership and teamwork<\/td><td>Group projects, internship evaluations<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Lifelong learning and research skills<\/td><td>Research projects, independent studies, capstone projects<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Evidence from assessment reports, graduate performance data, employer satisfaction surveys, and external stakeholder feedback indicates that graduates of the Bachelor of Accountancy Programme generally demonstrate the knowledge, professional competencies, analytical abilities, communication skills, ethical values, and lifelong learning capabilities expected of accounting professionals. Employer satisfaction surveys and internship evaluations further confirm that graduates possess competencies that meet the expectations of industry and professional practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ID_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Name_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5.1<\/td><td>&nbsp;Students\u2019 Output<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5.2<\/td><td>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1pQT1xzn48dT4weUPGfDNzCtRGaxmmW_x\/view?usp=share_link\">Sample TQF 3<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5.3<\/td><td><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1fxtK2aFHjrAkcq5IHoDdSW7cIWWLVZIQ\/view?usp=share_link\">Sample TQF 5<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5.4<\/td><td>Verification of The Learning Outcomes<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5.5<\/td><td>Students\u2019 Assessment Score<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5.6<\/td><td>Employer Survey<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5.7<\/td><td>Sample Rubrics and Scoring<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5.8<\/td><td>Alignment of the Learning Outcomes with Assessment Methods<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4.6 Feedback of student assessment is shown to be provided in a timely manner.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the Bachelor of Business Administration program, including the Business Finance course,&nbsp;<strong>timely and constructive feedback<\/strong>&nbsp;is considered essential for supporting student learning and improving performance. As per institutional policy and course requirements,&nbsp;<strong>each course mandates that instructors provide assessment feedback<\/strong>\u2014whether from quizzes, assignments, case studies, or exams\u2014within a reasonable and clearly communicated timeframe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Feedback is typically provided through Google Classroom and Line groups<\/strong>, ensuring direct, accessible communication with students. These tools allow instructors to upload annotated assignments, post comments, and respond to student queries promptly. According to the course plan outlined in&nbsp;<strong>TQF5 for Business Finance<\/strong>, feedback is given progressively through class discussions, individual and group feedback sessions, and graded rubrics aligned with learning outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The timing of the feedback, especially following midterm exams and ongoing assessments (e.g., case studies or budgeting tasks), ensures that&nbsp;<strong>students can identify gaps in their understanding and refine their preparation strategies<\/strong>&nbsp;for the final assessments. This is particularly important in a technical course like Business Finance, where errors in calculation or conceptual misunderstanding can significantly affect performance. Timely feedback also&nbsp;<strong>motivates student engagement and encourages reflective learning<\/strong>, as seen in student evaluation reports showing a positive perception of the relevance and helpfulness of feedback (average score of 3.57\u20133.75 out of 5 on feedback clarity and learning support).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ultimately, by making timely feedback a core component of instructional delivery, the course assures alignment with expected learning outcomes and contributes to improved student performance in summative assessments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ID_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Name_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.6.1<\/td><td>&nbsp;Google Classroom<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.6.2<\/td><td>&nbsp;Calendar of Activities<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.6.3<\/td><td><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>Assessment Scores of Students<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.6.4<\/td><td>Management Information System<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>4.7 The student assessment and its processes are shown to be continuously reviewed and improved to ensure their relevance to the needs of industry and alignment to the expected learning outcomes.<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the Bachelor of Accountancy program,&nbsp;<strong>student assessments and their processes are systematically and regularly reviewed<\/strong>&nbsp;to maintain alignment with industry standards and the expected learning outcomes (ELOs) of both the courses and the overall program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Review Procedure and Frequency<\/strong>:<br>Assessment reviews are conducted&nbsp;<strong>at the end of every academic semester<\/strong>&nbsp;and during&nbsp;<strong>TQF3 and TQF5 submissions<\/strong>, as well as through the&nbsp;<strong>annual SAR (Self-Assessment Report)<\/strong>&nbsp;process. These reviews involve faculty meetings, external evaluator feedback, academic committee evaluations, and analysis of midterm and final exam performance data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Aspects Under Review<\/strong>:<br>The review focuses on the&nbsp;<strong>relevance, fairness, and effectiveness<\/strong>&nbsp;of assessment tools including:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Assessment rubrics and marking schemes<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Midterm and final exam content<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Google Classroom performance records<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Formative assessments such as projects, quizzes, and group presentations<\/strong><br>These are analyzed for their ability to accurately measure targeted learning outcomes and address emerging trends and skills required in the accounting industry, such as digital finance tools, ethical reasoning, and compliance with updated financial regulations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Alignment to Industry Needs<\/strong>:<br>To maintain industry relevance,&nbsp;<strong>current professional standards, employer feedback, and graduate employment outcomes<\/strong>&nbsp;are considered during assessment design and revision. For instance, assessment tasks simulate workplace scenarios such as preparing audit reports, conducting financial analysis, or applying ethical accounting standards\u2014ensuring practical applicability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Evaluation of Alignment to ELOs<\/strong>:<br>Assessments are cross-referenced with&nbsp;<strong>TQF3 and TQF5 learning outcome domains<\/strong>&nbsp;to ensure that each task contributes to achieving one or more of the expected learning outcomes. Regular&nbsp;<strong>gap analyses<\/strong>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<strong>assessment-mapping matrices<\/strong>&nbsp;are used to identify underassessed competencies and revise instructional strategies accordingly. The Learning and Development Plans are also aligned to support students where gaps are found, using&nbsp;<strong>academic advising, tutoring, and online learning tools<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Continuous Improvement Measures<\/strong>:<br>Feedback from&nbsp;<strong>external quality assurance reviewers<\/strong>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<strong>employers<\/strong>&nbsp;is integrated into assessment revision. Faculty qualifications and industry engagement further support relevant content delivery. When inconsistencies or misalignments are identified,&nbsp;<strong>modifications to exam content, rubric standards, and instructional scaffolding<\/strong>&nbsp;are implemented in the following term.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In conclusion, the program\u2019s&nbsp;<strong>feedback-driven and evidence-based assessment improvement system<\/strong>&nbsp;ensures that students are evaluated on the competencies required not only for academic success but also for professional readiness in the evolving accounting and financial services sector.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>ID_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Name_Evidence<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.1<\/td><td>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1pQT1xzn48dT4weUPGfDNzCtRGaxmmW_x\/view?usp=share_link\">TQF 3 Submission<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.2<\/td><td>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1fxtK2aFHjrAkcq5IHoDdSW7cIWWLVZIQ\/view?usp=share_link\">TQF 5 Submission<\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.3<\/td><td>Review\/Comment of the Examination Paper<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.4<\/td><td>Review Assignment for TQF 3 and 5<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.5<\/td><td>MIS Course Coordinator<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.6<\/td><td>Teachers\u2019 Evaluation<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.7<\/td><td>Curriculum Committee Review<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.8<\/td><td>Employers\u2019 Comments and Feedback<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7.9<\/td><td>Alumni Feedback<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Self-Assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Requirements<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Result<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Score<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.1 A variety of assessment methods are shown to be used and are shown to be constructively aligned to achieving the expected learning outcomes and the teaching and learning objectives.<\/td><td>\/<\/td><td>1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.2 The assessment and assessment-appeal policies are shown to be explicit, communicated to students, and applied consistently.<\/td><td>\/<\/td><td>1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.3 The assessment standards and procedures for student progression and degree completion, are shown to be explicit, communicated to students, and applied consistently.<\/td><td>\/<\/td><td rowspan=\"2\">1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.7 The student assessment and its processes are shown to be continuously reviewed and improved to ensure their relevance to the needs of industry and alignment to the expected learning outcomes.<\/td><td>&nbsp;<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.4 The assessments methods are shown to include rubrics, marking schemes, timelines, and regulations, and these are shown to ensure validity, reliability, and fairness in assessment.<\/td><td>\/<\/td><td rowspan=\"2\">1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.5 The assessment methods are shown to measure the achievement of the expected learning outcomes of the programme and its courses.<\/td><td>\/<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>4.6 Feedback of student assessment is shown to be provided in a timely manner.<\/td><td>\/<\/td><td>1<\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\"><strong>Overall<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><td><strong>5<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"menu_order":7,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","class_list":["post-15315","acc_report","type-acc_report","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/acc_report\/15315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/acc_report"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/acc_report"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15315"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/business\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}