{"id":17575,"date":"2025-03-09T07:38:31","date_gmt":"2025-03-09T07:38:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stic.ac.th\/qafs2425\/education\/?post_type=ede_report&p=17575"},"modified":"2026-05-26T12:19:55","modified_gmt":"2026-05-26T12:19:55","slug":"%e0%b8%aa%e0%b9%88%e0%b8%a7%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%97%e0%b8%b5%e0%b9%88-4-%e0%b8%9c%e0%b8%a5%e0%b8%81%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%a3%e0%b8%94%e0%b8%b3%e0%b9%80%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%b4%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%87%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%99-5","status":"publish","type":"ede_report2","link":"https:\/\/qa.trsu.ac.th\/education\/?ede_report2=%e0%b8%aa%e0%b9%88%e0%b8%a7%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%97%e0%b8%b5%e0%b9%88-4-%e0%b8%9c%e0%b8%a5%e0%b8%81%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%a3%e0%b8%94%e0%b8%b3%e0%b9%80%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%b4%e0%b8%99%e0%b8%87%e0%b8%b2%e0%b8%99-5","title":{"rendered":"Section 4 Performance Results Based on Quality Criteria (Criterion 5 – Academic Staff)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Criterion 5 – Academic Staff<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Criterion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Requirements<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Quality level assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

5.1 The programme to show that academic staff planning (including succession, promotion, re-deployment, termination, and retirement plans) is carried out to ensure that the quality and quantity of the academic staff fulfill the needs for education, research, and service.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To ensure that the quality and number of academic staff remain aligned with the evolving demands of teaching, research, and community service, the program implements a comprehensive academic staff management and planning strategy. This strategy includes succession planning, promotion, re-deployment, termination, and retirement, forming an integrated framework that supports a sustainable and progressive academic environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This approach is designed to support professional development, acknowledge outstanding contributions, and respond effectively to the changing needs of the institution. Through strategic planning at every stage of an academic staff member\u2019s career, the program ensures the development of a competent, motivated, and future-ready academic workforce capable of delivering quality instruction, innovative research, and meaningful service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Succession Planning<\/strong>
The Faculty proactively identifies and develops potential future leaders among academic staff through mentoring, professional development programs, and leadership training initiatives. This process helps ensure continuity in leadership roles and maintains excellence in teaching, research, and academic administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Promotion<\/strong>
The promotion system recognizes academic achievement and valuable contributions to research, instruction, and community engagement. Performance evaluations are conducted using transparent and clearly defined criteria to ensure deserving staff members are appropriately acknowledged and supported in their career advancement, promoting a culture of excellence and continuous improvement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Re-deployment<\/strong>
The program adopts strategic re-deployment practices to maximize the effective use of academic expertise. Academic staff are assigned based on their competencies, specialization, and institutional needs, allowing the program to respond efficiently to emerging academic priorities and challenges while enhancing overall program effectiveness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Termination<\/strong>
Termination procedures are implemented in accordance with institutional regulations, fairness, and transparency. The process includes proper evaluation, documentation, and opportunities for improvement or remediation when necessary. In cases where termination is required, it is carried out professionally and respectfully to maintain a positive and ethical organizational environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Evidence<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

ID_Evidence<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>Name_Evidence<\/strong><\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
5.1-1<\/td>Instructor Management: System and Mechanism<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
5.1-2<\/td> Faculty Operational Plan 2025<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
5.1.3 <\/td> Faculty Strategic PLan <\/a><\/td><\/tr>
5.1-4<\/td>Program Monitoring Calendar<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

5.2 The programme to show that staff workload is measured and monitored to improve the quality of education, research, and service.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Operational Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our program implements a systematic approach to measuring and monitoring academic staff workload to ensure the continuous improvement of teaching quality, research productivity, and community service. This approach covers instructors\u2019 subject assignments, supervision, monitoring, evaluation, and improvement processes. It is designed to maintain a balanced workload among instructors while upholding high academic standards and fostering an environment that supports professional development and excellence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Through careful planning, regular monitoring, and ongoing evaluation, the program ensures that instructors are adequately supported in delivering quality instruction and engaging in meaningful research and service activities. This system not only addresses the professional needs of academic staff but also reinforces the program\u2019s commitment to continuous quality improvement in all areas of academic and institutional performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instructors\u2019 Subject Assignment<\/strong>
Prior to the beginning of each academic year, the program conducts curriculum planning meetings to assign instructors to the subjects offered for the upcoming semesters, with careful consideration given to students\u2019 learning needs and program objectives. Instructor assignments are based on expertise, academic qualifications, teaching experience, and previous teaching performance evaluations. Student evaluation results from previously taught courses are also considered to ensure that qualified and high-performing instructors are assigned to relevant courses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Supervision, Monitoring, and Evaluation<\/strong>
The program chair and curriculum instructors are responsible for supervising, monitoring, and evaluating instructors\u2019 teaching performance and workload management throughout the semester. This process includes regular consultations, classroom observations when necessary, and continuous monitoring to ensure compliance with academic standards and effective instructional delivery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the end of each semester, students evaluate their instructors\u2019 teaching performance through formal evaluation processes. The results serve as an important component of the program\u2019s quality assurance system and provide valuable feedback for instructional improvement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addition, the program regularly reviews and evaluates the system used for assigning instructors to subjects. Feedback and recommendations gathered from evaluations are utilized to improve workload distribution and ensure alignment with program goals and institutional priorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Improvement Process from Evaluation Results<\/strong>
The program encourages instructors to utilize feedback from teaching evaluations to enhance their instructional practices and professional development. Improvement plans and recommendations derived from evaluation results are documented and reflected in the instructors\u2019 TQF reports, supporting a continuous cycle of reflection, development, and quality enhancement. Through this process, the program promotes continuous improvement in teaching effectiveness and overall academic performance<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Workload Measurement and Monitoring<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To specifically address instructors  workload, our program measures and monitors the workload of each instructor to ensure it is balanced and manageable. This involves:<\/p>\n\n\n\n