Criteria 7.4 ผลลัพธ์ด้านการนำองค์กรและการกำกับดูแลองค์กร (Leadership and Governance Results)
Requirements
Quality level assessment
Result 7.4
The Dean has communicated the Faculty’s vision, values, and curriculum details to faculty members, support staff, students, and other stakeholders using various channels, many of which allow for two-way communication. These values are also demonstrated through the behavior of the Dean and the administrative committee.
Vision and Values Conveyance to the Target Group
| Receiver | Communication Channel | Communication topic | Results |
| Faculty members support staff | * Faculty Meeting * Program Meeting | * Vision, mission, and values * Strategic plan and projects * Building a relationship * Problems solution | * Mutual understandings * Engagement (Table 1) * Satisfaction (Table 2) * Improved responsibility and job performance Self-evaluation (Table 3) |
| Current students | * Orientation * Advisor- advisee meeting * Faculty’s Facebook page | * Vision, mission, and values * Building relationships * Problem solutions * General information * Rules and regulations | * Stronger and better relationship and understanding * Improved learning outcomes and English Proficiency (Table 4) |
| Graduate users | * Internship / Cooperative education project * Brochure * Faculty website/ Facebook page | * Faculty’s programs/ activities | * Temporary networks * Feedback on students’ performance (Table 5) * Comments and suggestions on curriculum improvement |
| Alumni | * Faculty website/ Facebook page * Line Group | * General information * Rules and regulations * important events * Faculty’s programs/ activities | * Comments and suggestions on the curriculum Improvement * Suggests to current students the real working experiences |
| Suppliers | * Faculty website/ Facebook page * Tertiary-education Guidance road trip | – Vision, mission, and values – Faculty’s programs/activities | * Developing networks * Sources of potential students |
| Collaborators | * Faculty website/ Facebook page * Internship / Cooperative education project | – Vision and values – Faculty’s programs/activities | * Developing networks * Research data sources (KM) |
Table 1: Faculty Members’ Engagement
| Evaluation Item | Level of Satisfaction |
| Working to achieve the Faculty’s objectives | 4.59 |
| Pride and loyalty towards the Faculty | 4.55 |
| Maintaining membership and being part of the Faculty | 4.29 |
| Overall | 4.47 |
Table 2: Faculty Members’ Satisfaction toward Curriculum Management
| Evaluation Item | Level of Satisfaction |
| Instructor recruitment and selection process | 4.56 |
| Instructor management and development | 4.26 |
| Teaching and learning process | 4.29 |
| Curriculum management process | 4.37 |
| Overall | 4.37 |
Table 3: Faculty Members’ Self-Evaluation
| Evaluation item | Evaluation Level |
| Part 1: Self capacity (overall) | 4.62 |
| Lesson plan/course syllabus construction | 4.43 |
| Subject matter update | 4.71 |
| Subject clarification | 4.71 |
| Part 2: Instruction (overall) | 4.51 |
| Content and planning | 4.52 |
| Lesson delivery technique | 4.54 |
| Knowledge and ability | 4.57 |
| Behavior | 4.57 |
| Teaching facility arrangement | 4.36 |
Table 4: Student Learning Outcomes (Current Student)
| Evaluation Item | Evaluation Level |
| 1. Learning Outcomes in Four Domains (overall) | 4.23 |
| 1.1 Knowledge | 5.00 |
| 1.2 Skills | 4.73 |
| 1.3 Ethics | 4.20 |
| 1.4 Character | 4.80 |
| 2. Effective Implementation of the Higher Education Standards (Overall) | 4.21 |
| 2.1 Results for Student Learning | 4.23 |
| 2.2 Results for Research and Innovation | 4.15 |
| 2.3 Results for Academic Services | 4.27 |
| 2.4 Results for Arts and Cultural Preservation | 4.25 |
| 2.5 Results for Management and Administration | 4.15 |
Table 5: Graduate Users’ Satisfaction Level to Graduates
| Evaluation Item | Evaluation Level |
| 1. TQF 5 (overall) | 4.68 |
| 1.1 Moral and ethics | 5.00 |
| 1.2 Knowledge | 4.73 |
| 1.3 Skills | 4.20 |
| 1.4 Interaction and teamwork | 4.80 |
| 1.5 Numerical communication and technology | 4.67 |
| 2. Learner Outcomes (Overall) | 5.53 |
| 2.1 Learner person | 4.53 |
| 2.2 Co-creator | 4.13 |
| 2.3 Active citizen | 4.93 |
| 3. English Skills and 21th Century Skills (Overall) | 4.85 |
| 3.1 English skills | 4.93 |
| 3.2 Learning skills and innovation | 4.53 |
| 3.3 Information media and technology | 4.00 |
| 3.4 Professional skills | 4.48 |
Promotion of Equality, Participation, and Risk Challenge
Through its efforts in promoting legal and ethical behavior (1.1 ก (2)), enhancing communication (1.1 ข), fostering an environment for success (1.1 ค (1)), and maintaining a focus on action, the Faculty has observed the following results:
| Target Group | Activity | Ethical and Legal Conduct | Success Results |
| Faculty members and support staff | Oversight of adherence to rules and regulations for teaching and research activities | Maintaining awareness of adherence to the rules and regulations related to roles and responsibilities | * No instances of legal or regulatory violations * 4 high-quality research papers |
| Promoting transparency in work and conduct | Maintaining awareness of working and behaving according to the principles of Good Governance | * Students’ instructor evaluations (Table 6) | |
| Fostering moral conduct in the workplace | Demonstrating awareness of actions and conduct aligned with the Faculty’s values | * The Overall self-evaluation (see Table 3) * The Dean’s observations reflect the high moral standards of the faculty members. | |
| Encouraging work challenges | Fostering research initiatives | * A junior faculty member has created an innovative research project for another patent application. * Two faculty members, novice researchers, achieved their first publication in a TCI 2 journal. | |
| Encouraging equality and participation | * Promoting teamwork and mutual respect for roles * Ensuring all faculty members have equal opportunities to share their views | * Working as a team, the faculty members accomplished the goals of their assigned projects. * They accepted their roles and responsibilities as either leaders or followers. | |
| Students | Promoting adherence to rules and regulations | Maintaining awareness of rules and regulations compliance | * No instances of students violating laws, rules, or regulations * No cases of plagiarism |
| Encouraging ethics and morality reflecting the Faculty’s values through project participation | * Reinforcing ethical behavior and moral values * Promoting a sense of public service and generosity | * Good evaluation from the community * 9 Clip videos |
Table 6: Students’ Instructor Evaluation
| Evaluation Item | Level of Satisfaction |
| Presentation of Content and Expectations | 4.38 |
| Teaching Methods | 4.39 |
| Helpfulness/Availability | 4.37 |
| Feedback on Performance | 4.44 |
| Overall | 4.39 |
Table 7: Results of Sense of Public Service and Generosity Promotion
| Project | Satisfaction Level | Success Result | |
| Students | Teacher | ||
| 1. Academic/Community Services | |||
| – Banchawagyao School | 4.59 | 4.64 | Higher O-net scores |
| – Pattara Pittayajarn School | 4.61 | 4.92 | Content creation skill development for social media |
| – Dong Lakhon Historical Park | – | 1 video clip | |
| 2. Moral and Ethics Development | – | Promoting unity, morality, and ethics. | |
| 3. Green University: Campus for Changes | – | 9 video clips | |
หลักฐาน
| รหัสหลักฐาน | ชื่อหลักฐาน(พร้อมแนบลิ้งค์) |
| 7.4.1 (1) -1 | รายชื่ออาจารย์รับผิดชอบ KM ปี 2022 -2025 |
| 7.4.1 (1) -2 | ผลงานทางวิชาการของอาจารย์ |
| 7.4.1 (1) -3 | ผลการประเมิน “นักศึกษาประเมินอาจารย์” |
| 7.4.1 (1) -4 | ผลการประเมิน “อาจารย์ประเมินตนเอง” |
| 7.4.1 (1) -5 | งานวิจัยของนักวิจัยหน้าใหม่ |
| 7.4.1 (1) -6 | ผลการประเมินจากโรงเรียนบ้านชะวากยาว และโรงเรียนภัทรพิทยาจารย์ |
| 7.4.1 (1) -7 | คลิปวิโอจากศิษย์เก่า |
| 7.4.1 (1) -8 | คลิปวิดีโอดงละคร |
| 7.4.1 (1) -9 | คลิปวิด่โอ Green university: Campus for changes |
Governance System
| Responsibility | Governance System | Results |
| Action plans: * Education Management | * Indicators are conveyed through meetings to facilitate implementation. * Performance is reported monthly, and results are summarized quarterly. * Adopting recommendations from external auditors, alumni, and graduate employers to enhance quality. | * All projects were completed and reported to the Office Policy Planning. * Both the revised BE and CA curricula were approved. * Collaboration with UK universities to establish the ‘Top Up’ program. * Collaboration with Christian College, a university in the Philippines * A short course: Diploma in Filming * Efficient use of the annual budget. * Secured research funding. |
| * Research and innovation | * 4 Research articles publication * External Research Grants | |
| * Academic and community service | * Collaborating with 2 new communities: “Pattara Pittayajar School” / Dong Lakhon Historical Park 1 repeat Community “Baan Chawagyao School,” * Producing 1 documentary video clip promoting the cultural heritage of the local community. (see Table 7 ) | |
| Transparency | * Implementation of a faculty-level quality assessment system * Performance results reported to the Dean and the Office of Policy and Planning * Faculty members evaluate the Dean’s performance | * The Dean’s performance evaluation: 1. Good Governance Questionnaire (Table 8) 2. Administration Capacity (Table 9) * The use of project and annual budgets has been approved by the Office of Policy and Planning. (Table 10) |
| * Selecting the Faculty Committee and project leaders * Ensuring transparency through information disclosure | * Faculty committee selection process * Tracking and evaluating project and activity results | * The annual action plan specifies the faculty member responsible for each project. * The Faculty committee is composed by default of the Dean and the two program heads. * Completed projects are reported to the Office of Policy and Planning. |
| Protection of stakeholders’ interests | Research involving human participants requires approval from the University Research Ethics Committee. | * Research papers resulting from collaboration between the community and the Faculty. * Research papers authored by students. |
| Succession planning for leaders | Develop potential faculty members for leadership positions across various levels. | * Assign a new role and responsibility to junior faculty members. |
Table 8: The Dean’ Good Governance Evaluation
| Good Governance Items | Evaluation Level |
| Effectiveness | 4.71 |
| Efficiency | 4.57 |
| Responsiveness | 4.67 |
| Accountability | 4.71 |
| Transparency | 4.86 |
| Participation | 4.67 |
| Decentralization | 4.57 |
| Rules of Law | 4.79 |
| Equity | 4.64 |
| Consensus oriented | 4.71 |
| Overall | 4.68 |
Table 9: The Dean’ Administration Capacity Evaluation
| Evaluation Aspect | Evaluation Level |
| Leadership quality and competency | 4.55 |
| Organizational development | 4.63 |
| Interpersonal relations | 4.71 |
| The art of winning the hearts of subordinates. | 4.68 |
| Overall | 4.64 |
Table 10: Budget Spending
| Mission plan | Academic year 2025 | |
| Allocated budget | Budget spent | |
| 1. Education Management | 125,000 | 30,000 |
| Curriculum administration | 20,0000 | – |
| Academic administration | 80,000 | 30,0000 |
| Personnel development | 25,000 | – |
| 2. Student development | 71,000 | 31,813 |
| 3. Research and innovation | 5,000 | – |
| 4. Academic service | 50,000 | 9,776 |
| 5. Art and culture conservation | 24,000 | 13,000 |
| 6. Administration | 220,000 | 202,080 |
| Work administration | – | – |
| Personnel administration | – | – |
| Facilities and equipment administration | 220,000 | 202,080 |
| Information administration | – | – |
| Administrative process development | – | – |
| Total | 495,000 | 286,669 |
หลักฐาน
| รหัสหลักฐาน | ชื่อหลักฐาน(พร้อมแนบลิ้งค์) |
| 7.4.1 (2) -1 | ตารางแสดงการใช้งบประมาณ |
| 7.4.1 (2) -2 | ผลการประเมินคณบดี |
| 7.4.1 (2) -3 | รูป MOU |
| 7.4.1 (2) -4 | รูปบริการวิชาการ |
| 7.4.1 (2) -5 | ข้อมูลแสดงความคิดเห็นเรื่องการปรับปรุงหลักสูตรจากศิษย์เก่าและ stakeholders |
| 7.4.1 (2) -6 | ทุนวิจัย |
| 7.4.1 (2) -7 | งานวิจัย |
| 7.4.1 (2) -8 | สรุปโครงการ |
| 7.4.1 (2) -9 | หลักสูตรระยะสั้น |
| 7.4.1 (2) -10 | การนิเทศนักศึกษาฝึกงาน |
The Faculty ensures that all levels of administration operate in compliance with laws, rules, and regulations to support quality assurance. It also promotes legal and ethical behavior in the management and execution of all its missions. The results are shown in the table below.
| Mission | Ethical and legal measures | Result | |
| Education Management | Curriculum management | * Abide by the framework of the Higher Education | The two curricula * The BE and CA curricula were accredited. |
| Teaching and Learning * Classroom responsibility * Evaluation and assessment | * Following the University’s regulations *Following the productive-based teaching | * Students’ feedback in TQF 5 * Students’ instructor evaluation (see Table 6) * Fourth-year students’ 4 research papers, one of which was published in an international journal. * Students’ 65 productive work pieces | |
| Lecturers | -*Good Governance Handbook * Standard of Ethical Conduct | * Absence of student complaints * Teaching quality evidenced by student evaluations, class observations, and peer assessments | |
| Research and Innovation | * Research collaborations * Community as research data sources | * Adhere to research ethics * Request permission to access the community * Obtain consent from research participants | * 4 research papers published in SCOPUS and TCI journals * 2 new community collaborations |
| Academic and community service | * Collaboration between the community and the Faculty * Ask for permission to provide the service | * The University’s regulation * Comply with the community rules | * 2 academic and community services with 4 activities * 1 documentary videos to publicize the local historical heritage |
หลักฐาน
| รหัสหลักฐาน | ชื่อหลักฐาน(พร้อมแนบลิ้งค์) |
| 7.4.1 (3) -1 | แบบฟอร์มความยินยอมของผู้เข้าร่วมการวิจัย |
| 7.4.1 (3) -2 | ผลการประเมิน “นักศึกษาประเมินอาจารย์” |
| 7.4.1 (3) -3 | Peer observation |
| 7.4.1 (3) -4 | วิจัยนักศึกษาทั้งหมด |
| 7.4.1 (3) -5 | งานวิจัยนักศึกษาที่ตีพิมพ์ |
| 7.4.1 (3) -6 | 1 video clips ของ CA |
To promote ethics as a core Faculty value, the Dean has established guidelines to instill it through staff development activities and to embed it within both programs. The Dean emphasizes that she, along with all faculty members and support staff, operates with transparency by strictly adhering to the principles of good governance outlined in the Handbook of Good Governance and the Standard of Ethical Conduct. The results are presented below.
| Target Group | Activity | Ethical Conduct | Results |
| Faculty members and support staff | Oversight of adherence to rules and regulations governing teaching and research | Maintaining awareness of compliance with rules and regulations related to work and responsibilities | * Evaluation of the Dean’s transparency (see Table 8) * Faculty members’ self-evaluation (see Table 3) * Students’ instructor evaluation (see Table 6) |
| Encouraging transparent work and conduct | Maintaining awareness of working and behaving according to the principles of good governance | ||
| Fostering moral conduct in the workplace | Maintaining awareness of working and behaving according to the Faculty’s values | * Good evaluation from students (see Table 6) * The Dean’s evaluation for salary promotion and contract renewal | |
| Students | Encouraging rule and regulation compliance | Maintaining awareness of compliance with rules and regulations | * No record of students breaking the rules and regulations * No plagiarism |
| Encouraging ethical conduct and morality based on the Faculty’s values and project participation | * Strengthening good ethical conduct and morality * strengthening a sense of public contribution and generosity | * Good evaluation from the community (see Table7 ) |
หลักฐาน
| รหัสหลักฐาน | ชื่อหลักฐาน(พร้อมแนบลิ้งค์) |
| 7.4.1 (4) -1 | A Handbook of Good Governance |
| 7.4.1 (4) -2 | Standards of Ethical Conduct |
| 7.4.1 (4) -3 | ผลการประเมินคณบดี |
| 7.4.1 (4) -4 | ผลการประเมิน “อาจารย์ประเมินตนเอง” |
| 7.4.1 (4) -5 | ผลการประเมิน “นักศึกษาประเมินอาจารย์” |
| 7.4.1 (4) -6 | สรุปโครงการบริการวิชาการ HuSo สู่ชุมชน |
The Faculty prioritizes the welfare and happiness of society by upholding its value of “SUSTAINABILITY.” To promote and maintain the well-being of surrounding communities, the Faculty supports the University’s policy to enhance quality of life and education through various projects that foster collaboration between the Faculty and communities at multiple levels.
Projects to Promote Social Well-Being.
| Project | Aspect creating Well-being | Community | Results |
| English camp (Academic service) | * Students gain English knowledge * Students develop a good attitude toward learning English * Strong relationship between the community and the Faculty | * Baan Chawagyao School, Baan-na District * Pattara Pittayajarn School | * A high satisfaction level (see Table 7) * Teaching materials on English classroom activities |
| *Academic service (CA) | * Residents’ skill development on content creating showcasing their community’ s way of life via social media | * Community residents learned how to create content to disseminate via social media to promote their community. | |
| Strong and Sustainable Community | Promoting the community’s products | * Dong Lakhon Historical Park | 1 video promoting local historical heritage |
หลักฐาน
| รหัสหลักฐาน | ชื่อหลักฐาน(พร้อมแนบลิ้งค์) |
| 7.4.1 (5) -1 | บริการวิชาการที่โรงเรียนบ้านชะวากยาว |
| 7.4.1 (5) -2 | บริการวิชาการที่โรงเรียนภัทรพิทยาจารย์ |
| 7.4.1 (5) -3 | รูปภาพและvideo ดงละคร |
Self-Assessment 7.4
| เกณฑ์คุณภาพ | ประเมินตนเอง | คะแนน |
| 1. ผลลัพธ์ด้านการนำองค์กร การกำกับดูแลองค์กร กฎหมาย จริยธรรม และการสร้างประโยชน์ให้สังคม | ||
| (1) การนำองค์กร (1 คะแนน) | / | 1 |
| (2) การกำกับดูแลองค์กร (1 คะแนน) | / | 1 |
| (3) กฎหมาย กฎระเบียบข้อบังคับ และการรับรองคุณภาพ (1 คะแนน) | / | 1 |
| (4) จริยธรรม (1 คะแนน) | / | 1 |
| (5) สังคม (1 คะแนน) | / | 1 |
| รวมผลการประเมินตนเอง Criteria 7.4 | 5 | |