Summary of Self-Assessment
Assessment Results Based on Quality Assurance Standards
Curriculum Standards B.E. 2565 (A.D. 2022)
| Requirement | Bachelors Program / Graduate Diploma Program | Masters Program / Doctoral Program | Pass/Fail |
| 1. Number of Full-Time Program Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 2. Qualifications of Instructors Responsible for a Curriculum/Program of Studies | 5 | – | Pass |
| 3. Qualifications of Full-Time Program Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 4. Qualifications of Teaching Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 5. Qualifications of Main Advisor for Thesis and Independent Study | – | – | – |
| 6. Qualifications of Coadvisors for Thesis and Independent Study (if applicable) | – | – | – |
| 7. Qualifications of Thesis and Independent Study Examiners | – | – | – |
| 8. Publication and Dissemination of Graduate Academic Output | – | – | – |
| 9. Workloads of Thesis and Independent Study Advisors in Graduate Programs | – | – | – |
| 10. Specified Period of Time Within Which Curriculum Must Be Revised | 5 | – | Pass |
Result………………Pass……………………….
Summary of Quality Assessment Results
The internal quality assurance at the program level has been evaluated based on the ASEAN University Network Quality Assurance (AUN-QA, Version 4.0) framework.
| Criteria | Item | Score |
| 1.Expected Learning Outcomes ( 5 item ) | 5 | 5 |
| 2.Programme Structure and Content ( 7 item ) | 7 | 5 |
| 3.Teaching and Learning Approach ( 6 item ) | 6 | 5 |
| 4.Student Assessment ( 7 item ) | 7 | 5 |
| 5.Academic Staff ( 8 item ) | 8 | 5 |
| 6.Student Support Services ( 6 item ) | 6 | 5 |
| 7.Facilities and Infrastructure ( 9 item ) | 9 | 5 |
| 8.Output and Outcomes ( 5 item ) | 5 | 5 |
| total | 5 | |
| Average Score | 5 | |
Overall Performance Summary
1. Strengths of the Programme
The Bachelor of Accountancy program demonstrates several key strengths that contribute to its overall quality and effectiveness:
Clear Outcome-Based Curriculum: The program uses a well-structured outcome-based education (OBE) model that aligns Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) with Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs), ensuring coherent and cumulative learning progress.
Highly Qualified and Dedicated Faculty: The program is supported by a team of well-qualified academic staff, many of whom possess advanced degrees and professional certifications in accounting and finance. Their expertise ensures the delivery of both theoretical foundations and industry-relevant knowledge.
Robust IT and Digital Infrastructure: The college provides strong IT support through modern computer labs, licensed accounting software (e.g., Tally ERP, QuickBooks), and a well-maintained Learning Management System (LMS), enabling blended and remote learning.
Consistent Graduate Employability: The program maintains a 100% employment rate for recent graduates, highlighting its alignment with industry expectations and the effectiveness of its academic training.
Effective Student Feedback Mechanism: Regular collection and analysis of student and stakeholder feedback allow the program to identify concerns promptly and implement timely improvements.
2. Weaknesses of the Programme
Despite its strong foundation, the program has identified some areas that require further attention:
Research Output: While student research is well integrated, the research productivity of academic staff—especially in international journals—remains below institutional targets.
Limited External Stakeholder Involvement: While employer feedback is occasionally collected, there is a need for more systematic engagement with industry professionals and alumni in curriculum development and strategic planning.
Curriculum Content Needs Updating: Some course content, especially in emerging fields like digital finance, ESG reporting, and AI in accounting, needs to be refreshed to meet current and future market demands.
Inconsistent Documentation of Teaching Strategies: Although various teaching methods are used, some course files lack clearly documented pedagogical strategies aligned with learning outcomes.
3. Areas for Improvement or Programme Enhancement in the Next Academic Year
To further enhance the quality and relevance of the program, the following actions are recommended:
Expand Student Career Services: Provide enhanced support for student career planning, including resume writing, mock interviews, and job placement partnerships with local audit and consulting firms.
Strengthen Industry Linkages: Establish a formal Advisory Board comprising alumni and industry experts to provide input on curriculum design, internships, and employability trends.
Update and Diversify Curriculum: Integrate emerging topics such as forensic accounting, blockchain in finance, data analytics, and global taxation to enhance graduate competitiveness.
Enhance Faculty Development: Organize regular training workshops on instructional design, outcome-based assessment, digital pedagogy, and research writing to improve teaching quality and publication rates.
Improve Benchmarking and QA Systems: Implement a structured benchmarking framework by comparing program performance with national and regional accounting programs. Develop a continuous quality improvement plan (CQI) based on annual review data.