Summary of Self-Assessment
Assessment Results Based on Quality Assurance Standards
Curriculum Standards B.E. 2565 (A.D. 2022)
| Requirement | Bachelors Program / Graduate Diploma Program | Masters Program / Doctoral Program | Pass/Fail |
| 1. Number of Full-Time Program Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 2. Qualifications of Instructors Responsible for a Curriculum/Program of Studies | 5 | – | Pass |
| 3. Qualifications of Full-Time Program Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 4. Qualifications of Teaching Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 5. Qualifications of Main Advisor for Thesis and Independent Study | – | – | – |
| 6. Qualifications of Coadvisors for Thesis and Independent Study (if applicable) | – | – | – |
| 7. Qualifications of Thesis and Independent Study Examiners | – | – | – |
| 8. Publication and Dissemination of Graduate Academic Output | – | – | – |
| 9. Workloads of Thesis and Independent Study Advisors in Graduate Programs | – | – | – |
| 10. Specified Period of Time Within Which Curriculum Must Be Revised | 5 | – | Pass |
Result………………….Pass……………………
Summary of Quality Assessment Results
The internal quality assurance at the program level has been evaluated based on the ASEAN University Network Quality Assurance (AUN-QA, Version 4.0) framework.
| Criteria | Item | Score |
| 1.Expected Learning Outcomes ( 5 item ) | 5 | 5 |
| 2.Programme Structure and Content ( 7 item ) | 7 | 5 |
| 3.Teaching and Learning Approach ( 6 item ) | 6 | 5 |
| 4.Student Assessment ( 7 item ) | 7 | 5 |
| 5.Academic Staff ( 8 item ) | 8 | 5 |
| 6.Student Support Services ( 6 item ) | 6 | 5 |
| 7.Facilities and Infrastructure ( 9 item ) | 9 | 5 |
| 8.Output and Outcomes ( 5 item ) | 5 | 1 |
| total | 36 | |
| Average Score | 4.50 | |
Overall Performance Summary
Strengths of the Program
-The program has successfully passed all national quality assurance criteria in accordance with the 2023 Undergraduate Curriculum Quality Standards.
-Internal quality assurance based on AUN-QA Version 4.0 resulted in an overall average score of 4.50, indicating a “Good” level of quality.
-The program clearly defines Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) aligned with the university’s vision and stakeholder expectations.
-The curriculum structure and content are comprehensive, up-to-date, and industry-relevant.
-Innovative and diverse teaching approaches have been adopted, including active student participation and alignment with aviation industry needs.
-The academic staff possess strong qualifications and expertise in their respective fields.
-Student support services are responsive, with effective academic advising and career support.
-Modern aviation-related facilities, such as flight simulators, enhance practical learning experiences.
Weaknesses of the Program
-The output and outcomes component scored low (1.00), indicating a need for improvement in graduate performance tracking, employment data, and stakeholder satisfaction.
-Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) need better alignment with the PLOs to ensure consistency across subjects.
-Limited communication channels with stakeholders regarding curriculum updates and feedback.
-The current assessment methods need to be reviewed to ensure complete mapping of CLOs.
-There is no clear long-term and short-term academic staff performance evaluation framework.
-No clear benchmarking has been done against similar programs at other institutions.
Areas for Improvement or Program Enhancement in the Next Academic Year
-Review and revise the CLOs to ensure strong linkage to PLOs across all courses.
-Improve mechanisms for tracking graduate data, research output, and alumni satisfaction to enhance the Output and Outcomes component.
-Increase engagement and communication with stakeholders to ensure their input is reflected in program improvements.
-Establish a systematic evaluation model for academic staff, covering both short-term and long-term development goals.
-Conduct benchmarking with similar national and international programs to improve competitiveness and relevance.
-Reassess support staff performance and infrastructure utilization to further enhance the student experience.