Summary of Self-Assessment
Assessment Results Based on Quality Assurance Standards
Curriculum Standards B.E. 2565 (A.D. 2022)
| Requirement | Bachelors Program / Graduate Diploma Program | Masters Program / Doctoral Program | Pass/Fail |
| 1. Number of Full-Time Program Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 2. Qualifications of Instructors Responsible for a Curriculum/Program of Studies | 5 | – | Pass |
| 3. Qualifications of Full-Time Program Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 4. Qualifications of Teaching Instructors | 5 | – | Pass |
| 5. Qualifications of Main Advisor for Thesis and Independent Study | – | – | – |
| 6. Qualifications of Coadvisors for Thesis and Independent Study (if applicable) | – | – | – |
| 7. Qualifications of Thesis and Independent Study Examiners | – | – | – |
| 8. Publication and Dissemination of Graduate Academic Output | – | – | – |
| 9. Workloads of Thesis and Independent Study Advisors in Graduate Programs | – | – | – |
| 10. Specified Period of Time Within Which Curriculum Must Be Revised | 5 | – | Pass |
Result………………….Pass……………………
Summary of Quality Assessment Results
The internal quality assurance at the program level has been evaluated based on the ASEAN University Network Quality Assurance (AUN-QA, Version 4.0) framework.
| Criteria | Item | Score |
| 1.Expected Learning Outcomes ( 5 item ) | 5 | 5 |
| 2.Programme Structure and Content ( 7 item ) | 7 | 5 |
| 3.Teaching and Learning Approach ( 6 item ) | 6 | 5 |
| 4.Student Assessment ( 7 item ) | 7 | 5 |
| 5.Academic Staff ( 8 item ) | 8 | 5 |
| 6.Student Support Services ( 6 item ) | 6 | 5 |
| 7.Facilities and Infrastructure ( 9 item ) | 9 | 5 |
| 8.Output and Outcomes ( 5 item ) | 5 | 5 |
| total | 5 | |
| Average Score | 5 | |
Overall Performance Summary
Strengths of the Program
- The programme benefits from qualified academic staff with recognized research publications.
- Student assessment includes timely feedback that supports learning development.
- A well-established information technology system enhances teaching and learning and ensures accessibility for both staff and students.
Weaknesses of the Program
- Lack of clear stakeholder identification and involvement in determining expected learning outcomes.
- Absence of a systematic review of teaching methods and curriculum relevance to industry trends.
- Limited clarity in teaching strategies that support lifelong learning, creativity, and innovation.
- Inadequate planning and development in student support services and co-curricular activities.
- Staff development and performance management systems are not clearly demonstrated or implemented.
Areas for Improvement or Program Enhancement in the Next Academic Year
- Clearly define and engage stakeholders in curriculum and outcome development.
- Regularly review curriculum content and update based on industry feedback.
- Establish clear teaching strategies that promote lifelong learning, creative thinking, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
- Align student assessment with industry expectations and expected learning outcomes (ELOs).
- Conduct a systematic needs analysis for academic staff development and implement performance management frameworks.
- Develop short-term and long-term plans for student support services, enhance co-curricular activities, and improve support staff competencies.
- Introduce benchmarking practices for both student support and programme outcomes to monitor quality and competitiveness.