Summary of Self-Assessment
Assessment Results Based on Quality Assurance Standards
Curriculum Standards B.E. 2565 (A.D. 2022)
| Requirement | Bachelors Program / Graduate Diploma Program | Masters Program / Doctoral Program | Pass/Fail |
| 1. Number of Full-Time Program Instructors | / | 3 | pass |
| 2. Qualifications of Instructors Responsible for a Curriculum/Program of Studies | / | 3 | pass |
| 3. Qualifications of Full-Time Program Instructors | / | 3 | pass |
| 4. Qualifications of Teaching Instructors | / | 5 | pass |
| 5. Qualifications of Main Advisor for Thesis and Independent Study | – | 5 | pass |
| 6. Qualifications of Coadvisors for Thesis and Independent Study (if applicable) | – | 5 | pass |
| 7. Qualifications of Thesis and Independent Study Examiners | – | 5 | pass |
| 8. Publication and Dissemination of Graduate Academic Output | – | 5 | pass |
| 9. Workloads of Thesis and Independent Study Advisors in Graduate Programs | – | 5 | pass |
| 10. Specified Period of Time Within Which Curriculum Must Be Revised | 5 | pass |
Result…………pass…………………..
Summary of Quality Assessment Results
The internal quality assurance at the program level has been evaluated based on the ASEAN University Network Quality Assurance (AUN-QA, Version 4.0) framework.
| Criteria | Item | Score |
| 1. Expected Learning Outcomes ( 5 items) | 5 | 5 |
| 2. Program Structure and Content (7 items) | 7 | 5 |
| 3. Student Assessment (7 items) | 6 | 5 |
| 4. Student Assessment (7 items) | 7 | 5 |
| 5. Academic Staff (8 items) | 8 | 5 |
| 6. Student Support Services (6 items ) | 6 | 5 |
| 7. Facilities and Infrastructure (9 items) | 9 | 5 |
| 6. Student Support Services (6 items) | 5 | 5 |
| total | 53 | |
| Average Score | 5 | |
Overall Performance Summary
Strengths of the Program
The program director/coordinator possesses:
Advanced academic qualifications
Substantial research achievements
Extensive professional experience
Student assessments align with intended learning outcomes through diverse evaluation methods, including:
E-portfolio documentation of work samples and competency attainment
Behavioural observation in collaborative learning activities
Performance evaluation in integrated projects
Curriculum delivery incorporates:
Digital learning activities (e.g., webinars, virtual conferences)
ICT-enhanced extracurricular programs
Weaknesses of the Program
.1)การติดตามผลการดำเนินงาน ในเรื่อง ผลผลิตและผลลัพธ์ผู้เรียน ของหลักสูตรยังดำเนินการได้ไม่ครอบคลุม และไม่ครบถ้วนตามเกณฑ์คุณภาพที่สถาบันกำหนด
1.The monitoring of student outputs and outcomes has not yet been comprehensively or fully implemented in accordance with the institutional quality standards for the program.
Areas for Improvement or Program Enhancement in the Next Academic Year
1)ควรมีการเทียบเคียงสมรรถนะ ผลผลิตและผลลัพธ์ของผู้เรียน กับหลักสูตรเดียวกัน หรือใกล้เคียงกัน ที่ดำเนินการโดยมหาวิทยาลัยอื่น เพื่อยกระดับคุณภาพการดำเนินการของหลักสูตรให้สูงขึ้น
2)ควรมีการกำกับติดตามข้อมูลที่แสดงให้เห็นถึงความสำเร็จของหลักสูตร ตามเป้าหมายและวัตถุประสงค์ของหลักสูตร
1.Benchmarking of student competencies, outputs, and outcomes should be conducted against comparable programs offered by other universities to enhance the program’s operational quality.
2. Systematic monitoring of performance indicators demonstrating program success should be implemented to ensure alignment with the program’s stated goals and objectives.